[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220627091521.3b80a4e8@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:15:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] net: dsa: ar9331: add support for pause
stats
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 19:10:08 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Is there an authoritative source who is able to tell whether rtnl_link_stats64 ::
> > rx_packets and tx_packets should count PAUSE frames or not?
>
> Yes, it will be interesting to know how to proceed with it.
I'm curious as well, AFAIK most drivers do not count pause to ifc stats.
> For example KSZ switch do count pause frame Bytes together will other
> frames. At same time, atheros switch do not count pause frame bytes
> at all.
>
> To make things worse, i can manually send pause frame of any size, so
> it will not be accounted by HW. What ever decision we will made, i
> will need to calculate typical pause frame size and hope it will fit
> for 90% of cases.
:(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists