linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 02/19] cacheinfo: Use of_cpu_device_node_get instead cpu_dev->of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220627165047.336669-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:50:30 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
        Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 02/19] cacheinfo: Use of_cpu_device_node_get instead cpu_dev->of_node

The of_cpu_device_node_get takes care of fetching the CPU'd device node
either from cached cpu_dev->of_node if cpu_dev is initialised or uses
of_get_cpu_node to parse and fetch node if cpu_dev isn't available yet.

Just use of_cpu_device_node_get instead of getting the cpu device first
and then using cpu_dev->of_node for two reasons:
1. There is no other use of cpu_dev and can be simplified
2. It enabled the use detect_cache_attributes and hence cache_setup_of_node
   much earlier before the CPUs are registered as devices.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621192034.3332546-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index dad296229161..b0bde272e2ae 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
 	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
-	struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
 	unsigned int index = 0;
 
@@ -166,11 +165,7 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!cpu_dev) {
-		pr_err("No cpu device for CPU %d\n", cpu);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-	np = cpu_dev->of_node;
+	np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
 	if (!np) {
 		pr_err("Failed to find cpu%d device node\n", cpu);
 		return -ENOENT;
-- 
2.36.1