linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dev-tools: fix one invalid url

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD-N9QX8w1pmYw85Og_vhOE63GgL3ZF4+5uLc6kBjBiJr_F3_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:40:23 +0800
From:   Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...ia.fr,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev-tools: fix one invalid url

On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 3:37 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 6:12 PM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:12:42PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> >> > > From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
> >> > >
> >> > > Fix the invalid url about Semantic Patch Language
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > I think what this patch doing is to point SPL reference URL from old
> >> > Coccinelle documentation (doc root) to actual SPL doc entry on new
> >> > Coccinelle page, right? If so, "fix invalid URL" may not be right patch
> >> > description and title.
> >>
> >> Agreed, thanks for the suggestion.
> >
> > Okay. Let's modify the title to "modify SPL reference URL to actual
> > SPL doc entry".
>
> Normally, the way to effect such a modification is to submit a new
> version of the patch reflecting the change.

I know this rule. It seems I forget to send a v2 patch.

>
> I've applied the original patch and made the change, but it's better not
> to ask maintainers to do that.

This change is surely on my part. I am sorry to forget about this v2 patch.

>
> Thanks,
>
> jon