linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf bpf: 8 byte align bpil data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVg9ZVOONuiJZopC7RyuEXvP8t79EFjQF0GCcV=atGbCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:17:51 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
Cc:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bpf: 8 byte align bpil data

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 6:47 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> bpil data is accessed assuming 64-bit alignment resulting in undefined
> behavior as the data is just byte aligned. With an -fsanitize=undefined
> build the following errors are observed:
>
> $ sudo perf record -a sleep 1
> util/bpf-event.c:310:22: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x55f61084520f for type '__u64', which requires 8 byte alignment
> 0x55f61084520f: note: pointer points here
>  a8 fe ff ff 3c  51 d3 c0 ff ff ff ff 04  84 d3 c0 ff ff ff ff d8  aa d3 c0 ff ff ff ff a4  c0 d3 c0
>              ^
> util/bpf-event.c:311:20: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x55f61084522f for type '__u32', which requires 4 byte alignment
> 0x55f61084522f: note: pointer points here
>  ff ff ff ff c7  17 00 00 f1 02 00 00 1f  04 00 00 58 04 00 00 00  00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 63  02 00 00
>              ^
> util/bpf-event.c:198:33: runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x55f61084523f for type 'const struct bpf_func_info', which requires 4 byte alignment
> 0x55f61084523f: note: pointer points here
>  58 04 00 00 00  00 00 00 0f 00 00 00 63  02 00 00 3b 00 00 00 ab  02 00 00 44 00 00 00 14  03 00 00
>
> Correct this by rouding up the data sizes and aligning the pointers.

Happy Monday, polite ping!

Thanks,
Ian

> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c
> index e271e05e51bc..80b1d2b3729b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c
> @@ -149,11 +149,10 @@ get_bpf_prog_info_linear(int fd, __u64 arrays)
>                 count = bpf_prog_info_read_offset_u32(&info, desc->count_offset);
>                 size  = bpf_prog_info_read_offset_u32(&info, desc->size_offset);
>
> -               data_len += count * size;
> +               data_len += roundup(count * size, sizeof(__u64));
>         }
>
>         /* step 3: allocate continuous memory */
> -       data_len = roundup(data_len, sizeof(__u64));
>         info_linear = malloc(sizeof(struct perf_bpil) + data_len);
>         if (!info_linear)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -180,7 +179,7 @@ get_bpf_prog_info_linear(int fd, __u64 arrays)
>                 bpf_prog_info_set_offset_u64(&info_linear->info,
>                                              desc->array_offset,
>                                              ptr_to_u64(ptr));
> -               ptr += count * size;
> +               ptr += roundup(count * size, sizeof(__u64));
>         }
>
>         /* step 5: call syscall again to get required arrays */
> --
> 2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog
>