linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: duplicate sysfs error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <165636114606.3997797.14770643051127333961.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:19:06 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     jarkko.nikula@...mer.com, tiwai@...e.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        daowens01@...il.com, peter.ujfalusi@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dowens@...cisionplanting.com,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: duplicate sysfs error

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:26:45 -0500, David Owens wrote:
> Convert to managed versions of sysfs and clk allocation to simplify
> unbinding and error handling in probe.  Managed sysfs node
> creation specifically addresses the following error seen the second time
> probe is attempted after sdma_pcm_platform_register() previously requested
> probe deferral:
> 
> sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/platform/68000000.ocp/49022000.mcbsp/max_tx_thres'
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: duplicate sysfs error
      commit: 6d31e225742a1955db8a0c6f6f52beb748a2895e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark