linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wcd9335: Use int array instead of bitmask for TX mixers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:19:10 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     tiwai@...e.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        bgoswami@...cinc.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        yassine.oudjana@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y.oudjana@...tonmail.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: wcd9335: Use int array instead of bitmask for TX mixers

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:17:45 +0400, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
> 
> Currently slim_tx_mixer_get reports all TX mixers as enabled when
> at least one is, due to it reading the entire tx_port_value bitmask
> without testing the specific bit corresponding to a TX port.
> Furthermore, using the same bitmask for all capture DAIs makes
> setting one mixer affect them all. To prevent this, and since
> the SLIM TX muxes effectively only connect to one of the mixers
> at a time, turn tx_port_value into an int array storing the DAI
> index each of the ports is connected to.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: wcd9335: Use int array instead of bitmask for TX mixers
      commit: 4b07ef55d1d4178dbec584195be148685ea25c59

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark