linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 040/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only leaf SPTEs for deleted/moved memslot for private mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <27acc4b2957e1297640d1d8b2a43f7c08e3885d5.1656366338.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:53:32 -0700
From:   isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     isaku.yamahata@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 040/102] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only leaf SPTEs for deleted/moved memslot for private mmu

From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>

For kvm mmu that has shared bit mask, zap only leaf SPTEs when
deleting/moving a memslot.  The existing kvm_mmu_zap_memslot() depends on
role.invalid with read lock of mmu_lock so that other vcpu can operate on
kvm mmu concurrently. Mark the root page table invalid, unlink it from page
table pointer of CPU, process the page table.  It doesn't work for private
page table to unlink the root page table because it requires all SPTE entry
to be non-present.  Instead, with write-lock of mmu_lock and zap only leaf
SPTEs for kvm mmu with shared bit mask.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 80d7c7709af3..c517c7bca105 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5854,11 +5854,44 @@ static bool kvm_has_zapped_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
 	return unlikely(!list_empty_careful(&kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages));
 }
 
+static void kvm_mmu_zap_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+	bool flush = false;
+
+	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * Zapping non-leaf SPTEs, a.k.a. not-last SPTEs, isn't required, worst
+	 * case scenario we'll have unused shadow pages lying around until they
+	 * are recycled due to age or when the VM is destroyed.
+	 */
+	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
+		struct kvm_gfn_range range = {
+		      .slot = slot,
+		      .start = slot->base_gfn,
+		      .end = slot->base_gfn + slot->npages,
+		      .may_block = false,
+		};
+
+		flush = kvm_tdp_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &range, flush);
+	} else {
+		flush = slot_handle_level(kvm, slot, kvm_zap_rmapp, PG_LEVEL_4K,
+					  KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, true);
+	}
+	if (flush)
+		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
 static void kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
 			struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 			struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
 {
-	kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
+	if (kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm))
+		kvm_mmu_zap_memslot(kvm, slot);
+	else
+		kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
 }
 
 int kvm_mmu_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
-- 
2.25.1