[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220627232919.GA3158390-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:29:19 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <mail@...chuod.ie>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>,
Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
Heng Sia <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] dt-bindings: dma: add Canaan k210 to Synopsys
DesignWare DMA
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:30:26PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> The Canaan k210 apparently has a Sysnopsys Designware AXI DMA
> controller, but according to the documentation & devicetree it has 6
> interrupts rather than the standard one. Add a custom compatible that
> supports the 6 interrupt configuration which falls back to the standard
> binding which is currently the one in use in the devicetree entry.
But it works with only 1 interrupt?
>
> Link: https://canaan-creative.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/kendryte_standalone_programming_guide_20190311144158_en.pdf #Page 58
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml | 35 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
> index 4324a94b26b2..bc85598151ef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/snps,dw-axi-dmac.yaml
> @@ -18,9 +18,13 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - snps,axi-dma-1.01a
> - - intel,kmb-axi-dma
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: canaan,k210-axi-dma
> + - const: snps,axi-dma-1.01a
I would drop this depending on your need for compatibility. Are you sure
on the IP version? It's not really compatible if the number of
interrupts is different.
> + - enum:
> + - snps,axi-dma-1.01a
> + - intel,kmb-axi-dma
>
> reg:
> minItems: 1
> @@ -33,9 +37,6 @@ properties:
> - const: axidma_ctrl_regs
> - const: axidma_apb_regs
>
> - interrupts:
> - maxItems: 1
> -
> clocks:
> items:
> - description: Bus Clock
> @@ -92,6 +93,22 @@ properties:
> minimum: 1
> maximum: 256
>
> +if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: canaan,k210-axi-dma
> +
> +then:
> + properties:
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 6
> +
> +else:
> + properties:
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> @@ -105,7 +122,7 @@ required:
> - snps,priority
> - snps,block-size
>
> -additionalProperties: false
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> examples:
> - |
> @@ -113,12 +130,12 @@ examples:
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> /* example with snps,dw-axi-dmac */
> dmac: dma-controller@...00 {
> - compatible = "snps,axi-dma-1.01a";
> + compatible = "canaan,k210-axi-dma", "snps,axi-dma-1.01a";
> reg = <0x80000 0x400>;
> clocks = <&core_clk>, <&cfgr_clk>;
> clock-names = "core-clk", "cfgr-clk";
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> - interrupts = <27>;
> + interrupts = <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, <32>;
Does the example really need changing? The old one was correct, right?
> #dma-cells = <1>;
> dma-channels = <4>;
> snps,dma-masters = <2>;
> --
> 2.36.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists