lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:50:25 +0800
From:   Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC:     <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <vschneid@...hat.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        <bristot@...hat.com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [Question] The system may be stuck if there is a cpu cgroup
 cpu.cfs_quato_us is very low

Hi all,

I'm working on debuging a problem.
The testcase does follew operations:
1) create a test task cgroup, set cpu.cfs_quota_us=2000,cpu.cfs_period_us=100000.
2) run 20 test_fork[1] test process in the test task cgroup.
3) create 100 new containers:
   for i in {1..100}; do docker run -itd  --health-cmd="ls" --health-interval=1s ubuntu:latest  bash; done

These operations are expected to succeed and 100 containers create success. however, when creating containers,
the system will get stuck and create container failed.

After debug this, I found the test_fork process frequently sleep in freezer_fork()->mutex_lock()->might_sleep()
with taking the cgroup_threadgroup_rw_sem lock, as follow:

copy_process():
	cgroup_can_fork()			---> lock cgroup_threadgroup_rw_sem
	sched_cgroup_fork();
	  ->task_fork_fair(){
	      ->update_curr(){
		  ->__account_cfs_rq_runtime() {
			resched_curr();		---> the quota is used up, and set flag TIF_NEED_RESCHED to current
		   }
	cgroup_post_fork();   		
	  ->feezer_fork()
	      ->mutex_lock() {	
		  ->might_sleep()  		---> schedule() and the current task will be throttled long time.

	  ->cgroup_css_set_put_fork()    	---> unlock cgroup_threadgroup_rw_sem


Becuase the task cgroup's cpu.cfs_quota_us is very small and test_fork's load is very heavy, the test_fork
may be throttled long time, therefore, the cgroup_threadgroup_rw_sem read lock is held for a long time, other
processes will get stuck waiting for the lock:

1) a task fork child, will wait at copy_process()->cgroup_can_fork();

2) a task exiting will wait at exit_signals();

3) a task write cgroup.procs file will wait at cgroup_file_write()->__cgroup1_procs_write();
...

even the whole system will get stuck.

Anyone know how to slove this? Except for changing the cpu.cfs_quota_us.


[1] test_fork.c

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    pid_t pid;
    int count = 20;

    while(1) {
        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
            if ((pid = fork()) <0) {
                printf("fork error");
                return 1;
            } else if (pid ==0) {
                exit(0);
            }
        }

        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
            wait(NULL);
        }
	sleep(1);
    }
    return 0;
}

Thanks a lot.
-Qiao
-

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ