linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] erofs: wake up all waiters after z_erofs_lzma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eef55261-753a-ac49-b237-eaea15e7c1d6@meizu.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 15:11:04 +0800
From:   Yuwen Chen <chenyuwen1@...zu.com>
To:     <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
CC:     <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <xiang@...nel.org>, <zbestahu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: wake up all waiters after z_erofs_lzma_head ready

The new patch has been upload. The modification points are as follower:

1. delete the period.

2. change 'W' to lowercase.

3. add a Reviewed-by tag.

On 6/27/22 06:40, Yuwen Chen wrote:
> When the user mounts the erofs second times, the decompression thread
> may hung. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the
> following:
>
> 1) Task A called z_erofs_load_lzma_config which obtain all of the node
>     from the z_erofs_lzma_head.
>
> 2) At this time, task B called the z_erofs_lzma_decompress and wanted to
>     get a node. But the z_erofs_lzma_head was empty, the Task B had to
>     sleep.
>
> 3) Task A release nodes and push nodes into the z_erofs_lzma_head. But
>     task B was still sleeping.
>
> One example report when the hung happens:
> task:kworker/u3:1 state:D stack:14384 pid: 86 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
> Workqueue: erofs_unzipd z_erofs_decompressqueue_work
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __schedule+0x281/0x760
>   schedule+0x49/0xb0
>   z_erofs_lzma_decompress+0x4bc/0x580
>   ? cpu_core_flags+0x10/0x10
>   z_erofs_decompress_pcluster+0x49b/0xba0
>   ? __update_load_avg_se+0x2b0/0x330
>   ? __update_load_avg_se+0x2b0/0x330
>   ? update_load_avg+0x5f/0x690
>   ? update_load_avg+0x5f/0x690
>   ? set_next_entity+0xbd/0x110
>   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xd/0x20
>   z_erofs_decompress_queue.isra.0+0x2e/0x50
>   z_erofs_decompressqueue_work+0x30/0x60
>   process_one_work+0x1d3/0x3a0
>   worker_thread+0x45/0x3a0
>   ? process_one_work+0x3a0/0x3a0
>   kthread+0xe2/0x110
>   ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
>   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>   </TASK>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuwen Chen <chenyuwen1@...zu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c b/fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c
> index 05a3063cf2bc..5e59b3f523eb 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/decompressor_lzma.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ int z_erofs_load_lzma_config(struct super_block *sb,
>   	DBG_BUGON(z_erofs_lzma_head);
>   	z_erofs_lzma_head = head;
>   	spin_unlock(&z_erofs_lzma_lock);
> +	wake_up_all(&z_erofs_lzma_wq);
>   
>   	z_erofs_lzma_max_dictsize = dict_size;
>   	mutex_unlock(&lzma_resize_mutex);