[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecc72279-0892-d5ab-689d-87b8fba5147e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:14:24 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/31] soc/tegra: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()
27.06.2022 09:45, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>> Looks okay. If you'll solve the cpufreq problem where OPP config is set
>> by two drivers for the same cpu device
> This is supported, there is some early freeing of resources on the
> removal path though, the reasoning for which I already gave in another
> email. Though, I am open to sorting that out as well, but nothing
> breaks the code for now AFAICT.
>
In case of Tegra, we use tegra-cpufreq driver that sets supported_hw and
registers cpufreq-dt. If cpufreq-dt driver defers the probe, then the
supported_hw will be lost on the re-probe. I haven't checked yet, but I
suppose that cpufreq-dt driver defers on Tegra30 because of the CPU
regulator and that's why we get the "OPP table is missing" error.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists