[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrlzSFkywHthpAZN@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:07:20 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, kernel@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup] cgroup: set the correct return code if hierarchy
limits are reached
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 05:12:55AM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> When cgroup_mkdir reaches the limits of the cgroup hierarchy, it should
> not return -EAGAIN, but instead react similarly to reaching the global
> limit.
While I'm not necessarily against this change, I find the rationale to
be somewhat lacking. Can you please elaborate why -ENOSPC is the right
one while -EAGAIN is incorrect?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists