[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <803785ef-42b7-647c-9653-702067439ae9@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:49:46 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: s.nawrocki@...sung.com, jrdr.linux@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: s3c24xx-i2s: Fix typo in DAIFMT handling
On 27/06/2022 11:43, Charles Keepax wrote:
> The conversion of the set_fmt callback to direct clock specification
> included a small typo, correct the affected code.
>
> Fixes: 91c49199e6d6 ("ASoC: samsung: Update to use set_fmt_new callback")
Where is this commit from? It's not in next.
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
You should put such big patchsets in your own repo (e.g. on
Github/Gitlab) and feed it to linux-next or at least to LKP.
This way you would get build coverage... because it seems the build was
missing in your case.
If you prefer not to include it in LKP or linux-next, no problem, but
then you need to build it.
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists