[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrmEBjtIu/4TOaQ/@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:18:46 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: re. Spurious wakeup on a newly created kthread
On Mon 27-06-22 17:21:12, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michal.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:07:22AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > So if somebody has woken up our thread from inside kthread() then it
> > doesn't have that pointer on the stack and I couldn't it find elsewhere
> > either. Maybe somebody has an idea where to look at.
>
> One way could be bpftrace'ing or printking __wake_up_common() and
> friends to dump backtrace if it's trying to wake a kthread whose comm
> starts with kworker/ and doesn't have (struct worker
> *)kthread_data(task)->pool set.
I am afraid I won't have a chance for a runtime debugging. All I have at
this stage is a crash dump.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists