[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220627121626.1595732-1-imagedong@tencent.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:16:25 +0800
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp:
net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless
Just fix them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index e099f2a12504..3de83e2a2611 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss
}
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
- /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections:
+ /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections:
* we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection
* is cheap under the msk socket lock
*/
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 654cc602ff2c..8c3e699d3387 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock)
/* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master
* socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed
* by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the
- * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct
+ * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct
* user.
*/
SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino;
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists