linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.10.125

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:25:26 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, lwn@....net,
        jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: Linux 5.10.125

On 6/27/22 2:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:54:23AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:42:06PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/26/22 6:04 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On 6/26/22 4:56 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
>>>>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm announcing the release of the 5.10.125 kernel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All users of the 5.10 kernel series must upgrade.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The updated 5.10.y git tree can be found at:
>>>>>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-5.10.y
>>>>>>> and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
>>>>>>> 	https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=summary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Makefile                              |    2 
>>>>>>>  arch/arm64/mm/cache.S                 |    2 
>>>>>>>  arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c                |    2 
>>>>>>>  drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c      |   34 ++++--------
>>>>>>>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c |   11 +++-
>>>>>>>  fs/io_uring.c                         |   23 +++++---
>>>>>>>  fs/zonefs/super.c                     |   92 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>>>>  net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c            |   31 ++++++++---
>>>>>>>  8 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian Borntraeger (1):
>>>>>>>       s390/mm: use non-quiescing sske for KVM switch to keyed guest
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Damien Le Moal (1):
>>>>>>>       zonefs: fix zonefs_iomap_begin() for reads
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric Dumazet (1):
>>>>>>>       tcp: add some entropy in __inet_hash_connect()
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greg Kroah-Hartman (1):
>>>>>>>       Linux 5.10.125
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jens Axboe (1):
>>>>>>>       io_uring: add missing item types for various requests
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lukas Wunner (1):
>>>>>>>       serial: core: Initialize rs485 RTS polarity already on probe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marian Postevca (1):
>>>>>>>       usb: gadget: u_ether: fix regression in setting fixed MAC address
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will Deacon (1):
>>>>>>>       arm64: mm: Don't invalidate FROM_DEVICE buffers at start of DMA transfer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Willy Tarreau (5):
>>>>>>>       tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset
>>>>>>>       tcp: add small random increments to the source port
>>>>>>>       tcp: dynamically allocate the perturb table used by source ports
>>>>>>>       tcp: increase source port perturb table to 2^16
>>>>>>>       tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5.10.125 commit df3f3bb5059d20ef094d6b2f0256c4bf4127a859 ("io_uring: add
>>>>>> missing item types for various requests") causes panic when running
>>>>>> test/iopoll.t from https://github.com/axboe/liburing commit
>>>>>> dda4848a9911120a903bef6284fb88286f4464c9 (liburing-2.2).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's a manually annotated panic message:
>>>>>> [  359.047161] list_del corruption, ffffa42098824f80->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
>>>>>> [  359.055393] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:47!
>>>>>> [  359.059786] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
>>>>>> [  359.065463] CPU: 11 PID: 15862 Comm: iopoll.t Tainted: G S        I       5.10.124 #1
>>>>>> [  359.081804] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x49/0x80
>>>>>> [  359.086880] Code: c2 22 48 39 d1 74 25 48 8b 11 48 39 f2 75 2d 48 8b 50 08 48 39 f2 75 34 b0 01 5d c3 48 c7 c7 68 15 79 b1 31 c0 e8 c5 a2 5a 00 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c7 d8 8e 76 b1 31 c0 e8 b5 a2 5a 00 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 69
>>>>>> [  359.105431] RSP: 0018:ffffb6b66785bd58 EFLAGS: 00010046
>>>>>> [  359.110592] RAX: 000000000000004e RBX: ffffa42098824f00 RCX: d07284ea1fbba400
>>>>>> [  359.117642] RDX: ffffa43f7f4f05b8 RSI: ffffa43f7f4dff48 RDI: ffffa43f7f4dff48
>>>>>> [  359.124691] RBP: ffffb6b66785bd58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffb1f38540
>>>>>> [  359.131740] R10: 00000000ffff7fff R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000282
>>>>>> [  359.138789] R13: ffffb6b66785beb8 R14: ffffa42095d33e00 R15: ffffa420937e3d20
>>>>>> [  359.145836] FS:  00000000004f8380(0000) GS:ffffa43f7f4c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>>> [  359.153830] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>>> [  359.159506] CR2: 0000000000539388 CR3: 000000027b57c006 CR4: 00000000003706e0
>>>>>> [  359.166552] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>>>> [  359.173600] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>>>> [  359.180647] Call Trace:
>>>>>> [  359.183064]  io_dismantle_req+0x1da/0x2b0
>>>>>>                     __list_del_entry [include/linux/list.h:132]
>>>>>>                     list_del [include/linux/list.h:146]
>>>>>>                     io_req_drop_files [fs/io_uring.c:5934]
>>>>>>                     io_req_clean_work [fs/io_uring.c:1315]
>>>>>>                     io_dismantle_req [fs/io_uring.c:1911]
>>>>>> [  359.187023]  io_do_iopoll+0x4e5/0x790
>>>>>> [  359.194602]  __se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x39b/0x6f0
>>>>>> [  359.208318]  __x64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x29/0x30
>>>>>> [  359.212793]  do_syscall_64+0x31/0x40
>>>>>> [  359.216324]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>>>>
>>>>> Well that sucks, I wonder why mine didn't fail like that. I'll see if I
>>>>> can hit this and send a fix. Thanks for reporting!
>>>>
>>>> Below should do it, I apologize for that. I think my test box booted the
>>>> previous kernel which is why it didn't hit it in my regression tests :-(
>>>>
>>>> Greg, can you add this to 5.10-stable? Verified it ran tests with the
>>>> right kernel now...
>>
>> Great, I'll go just do a release with this in it right now to help
>> others out.
> 
> 5.10.126 is now released with this fix.

Thanks - to both Gregs!

-- 
Jens Axboe