linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] TDX host kernel support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8853a55e32d6b5f5657e521094dbf01e371516fe.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:09:40 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, Jason@...c4.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, frederic@...nel.org, yuehaibing@...wei.com,
        dongli.zhang@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] TDX host kernel support

On Fri, 2022-06-24 at 12:47 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/22/22 04:15, Kai Huang wrote:
> > Please kindly help to review, and I would appreciate reviewed-by or
> > acked-by tags if the patches look good to you.
> 
> Serious question: Is *ANYONE* looking at these patches other than you
> and the maintainers?  I first saw this code (inside Intel) in early
> 2020.  In that time, not a single review tag has been acquired?
> 
> $ egrep -ic 'acked-by:|reviewed-by:' kais-patches.mbox
> 0

Hi Dave,

There were big design changes in the history of this series (i.e. we originally
supported loading both the NP-SEAMLDR ACM and the TDX module during boot, and we
changed from initializing the module from during kernel boot to at runtime), but
yes some other Linux/KVM TDX developers in our team have been reviewing this
series during the all time, at least at some extent.  They just didn't give
Reviewed-by or Acked-by.

Especially, after we had agreed that this series in general should enable TDX
with minimal code change, Kevin helped to review this series intensively and
helped to simplify the code to the current shape (i.e. TDMR part).  He didn't
give any of tags either (only said this series is ready for you to review),
perhaps because he was _helping_ to get this series to the shape that is ready
for you and other Intel reviewers to review.

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai