linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/22] regulator: fix a kernel-doc warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yrrh2QvCT7t79vPu@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:11:21 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] regulator: fix a kernel-doc warning

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:07:15PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:46:22AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

> > > document n_ramp_values field at struct regulator_desc, in order
> > > to solve this warning:  

> > This is patch 18 of a series for which I don't have a cover letter or
> > anything.  What's the story with dependencies here?

> There are no dependnecies. Each patch in this series is independent,
> touching different files.

OK.  In cases like this it really does generally help to send the
patches indepdently (or perhaps split per subsystem), it avoids
confusion.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)