[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ecd255ac85fac7ffa1b90975c9e08f11ddee149.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 23:34:55 +1200
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 029/102] KVM: TDX: allocate/free TDX vcpu structure
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 14:53 -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
>
> The next step of TDX guest creation is to create vcpu. Allocate TDX vcpu
> structures, initialize it. Allocate pages of TDX vcpu for the TDX module.
>
> In the case of the conventional case, cpuid is empty at the initialization.
> and cpuid is configured after the vcpu initialization. Because TDX
> supports only X2APIC mode, cpuid is forcibly initialized to support X2APIC
> on the vcpu initialization.
The patch title and commit message of this patch are identical to the previous
patch.
What happened? Did you forget to squash two patches together?
>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> index 067f5de56c53..4f4ed4ad65a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,38 @@ static void vt_vm_free(struct kvm *kvm)
> return tdx_vm_free(kvm);
> }
>
> +static int vt_vcpu_precreate(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + if (is_td(kvm))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return vmx_vcpu_precreate(kvm);
> +}
> +
> +static int vt_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> + return tdx_vcpu_create(vcpu);
> +
> + return vmx_vcpu_create(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +static void vt_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> + return tdx_vcpu_free(vcpu);
> +
> + return vmx_vcpu_free(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +static void vt_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> +{
> + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> + return tdx_vcpu_reset(vcpu, init_event);
> +
> + return vmx_vcpu_reset(vcpu, init_event);
> +}
> +
> static int vt_mem_enc_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
> {
> if (!is_td(kvm))
> @@ -98,10 +130,10 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops vt_x86_ops __initdata = {
> .vm_destroy = vt_vm_destroy,
> .vm_free = vt_vm_free,
>
> - .vcpu_precreate = vmx_vcpu_precreate,
> - .vcpu_create = vmx_vcpu_create,
> - .vcpu_free = vmx_vcpu_free,
> - .vcpu_reset = vmx_vcpu_reset,
> + .vcpu_precreate = vt_vcpu_precreate,
> + .vcpu_create = vt_vcpu_create,
> + .vcpu_free = vt_vcpu_free,
> + .vcpu_reset = vt_vcpu_reset,
>
> .prepare_switch_to_guest = vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest,
> .vcpu_load = vmx_vcpu_load,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> index ef6115ae0e88..42b634971544 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ int tdx_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> void tdx_mmu_release_hkid(struct kvm *kvm);
> void tdx_vm_free(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> +int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void tdx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event);
> +
> int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp);
> #else
> static inline int tdx_hardware_setup(struct kvm_x86_ops *x86_ops) { return 0; }
> @@ -150,6 +154,10 @@ static inline void tdx_mmu_release_hkid(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void tdx_flush_shadow_all_private(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void tdx_vm_free(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>
> +static inline int tdx_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> +static inline void tdx_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline void tdx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event) {}
> +
> static inline int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> #endif
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists