linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38ae1cc8-1411-bb54-e082-0f7b91cb9e63@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:33:58 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <hch@....de>
CC:     <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according
 to shost->max_sectors

On 28/06/2022 10:14, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> BTW, this patch has no real dependency on the rest of the series, so
>> could be taken separately if you prefer.
> Sure, you can send it separately. Adding it through the scsi tree is fine too.
> 

Well Christoph originally offered to take this series via the 
dma-mapping tree.

@Christoph, is that still ok with you? If so, would you rather I send 
this libata patch separately?

Thanks,
john