linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] soc: mediatek: Introduce mediatek-regulator-coupler driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:49:06 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wenst@...omium.org,
        alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
        digetx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: mediatek: Introduce mediatek-regulator-coupler
 driver

Hi Angelo,

On 6/28/22 14:01, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> +		mrc->vsram_rdev = rdev;
> +	} else if (!strstr(rdev_name, "vgpu") && !strstr(rdev_name, "Vgpu"))
> +		return 1;

Nit: checkpatch --strict should warn about the missing {} here. In
general braces are always needed for each condition if they were needed
once in the if-else.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry