linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:46:03 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        David Dai <daidavid1@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] spmi: pmic-arb: Add support for PMIC v7

On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 5:30 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 01/05/2022 22:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 22/02/2022 19:53, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> On 01-02-22, 19:11, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The is version 3 of support for PMIC v7. I have added a new property
> >>> qcom,bus-id for supporting v7 and then add driver changes for v7
> >>>
> >>> This depends on yaml conversion patch:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20211227170151.73116-1-david@ixit.cz/
> >>>
> >>
> >> Any feedback on this...
> >
> > Another gracious reminder about these patches. At this moment this is
> > one of the important pieces lacking for the full SM8450 support in the
> > upstream kernel.
>
> Stephen, yet another ping. This is the blocking point for the further
> SM8450 progress.

Pending since february!

I would rather suspect something is wrong and it somehow goes
into the spam or wrong inbox on Stephen's end.

Sounds like something Bjorn could solve if Stephen don't have time
to manage the SPMI subsystem right now? If it's OK with Stephen
or he simply don't respond we can just queue the stuff in the SoC
tree I assume?

Yours,
Linus Walleij