linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.18 097/181] Revert "net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:32:59 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 097/181] Revert "net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto_close
 executed repeatedly"

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:57:28AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:50:31 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:33:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:21:10 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> > >
>> > > [ Upstream commit 1b205d948fbb06a7613d87dcea0ff5fd8a08ed91 ]
>> > >
>> > > This reverts commit 69135c572d1f84261a6de2a1268513a7e71753e2.
>> > >
>> > > This commit was just papering over the issue, ULP should not
>> > > get ->update() called with its own sk_prot. Each ULP would
>> > > need to add this check.
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: 69135c572d1f ("net/tls: fix tls_sk_proto_close executed repeatedly")
>> > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> >
>> > Mm? How did 69135c572d1f get into stableh?
>> > I reverted it before it hit Linus's tree.
>> > Don't see the notification about it either.
>>
>> It is commit 075/181 in this series as you can see here:
>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627111946.738369250@linuxfoundation.org
>
>Argh, I forgot I'm not gonna get CCed if my tags aren't on the
>commit in question, sorry for the confusion.
>
>So I expected patches 075 and 097 would just get dropped since
>they are in the same series and are canceling each other out.
>But I guess people may edit reverts so you prefer not to
>automatically do that?

It's also the case that it's useful for historical purposes to keep
track of why a certain commit made it in or not.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha