| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:28:34 -0700
From: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
To: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] sched/fair: skip SIS domain search if fully busy
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 5:05 AM Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> If a full scan on SIS domain failed, then no unoccupied cpus available
> and the LLC is fully busy. In this case we'd better spend the time on
> something more useful, rather than wasting it trying to find an idle
> cpu that probably not exist.
>
> The fully busy status will be re-evaluated when any core of this LLC
> domain enters load balancing, and cleared once idle cpus found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 35 ++++++++++++++-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index 56cffe42abbc..3e99ac98d766 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -77,10 +77,43 @@ extern int sched_domain_level_max;
>
> struct sched_group;
>
> +/*
> + * States of the sched-domain
> + *
> + * - sd_has_icores
> + * This state is only used in LLC domains to indicate worthy
> + * of a full scan in SIS due to idle cores available.
> + *
> + * - sd_has_icpus
> + * This state indicates that unoccupied (sched-idle/idle) cpus
> + * might exist in this domain. For the LLC domains it is the
> + * default state since these cpus are the main targets of SIS
> + * search, and is also used as a fallback state of the other
> + * states.
> + *
> + * - sd_is_busy
> + * This state indicates there are no unoccupied cpus in this
> + * domain. So for LLC domains, it gives the hint on whether
> + * we should put efforts on the SIS search or not.
> + *
> + * For LLC domains, sd_has_icores is set when the last non-idle cpu of
> + * a core becomes idle. After a full SIS scan and if no idle cores found,
> + * sd_has_icores must be cleared and the state will be set to sd_has_icpus
> + * or sd_is_busy depending on whether there is any idle cpu. And during
> + * load balancing on each SMT domain inside the LLC, the state will be
> + * re-evaluated and switch from sd_is_busy to sd_has_icpus if idle cpus
> + * exist.
> + */
> +enum sd_state {
> + sd_has_icores,
> + sd_has_icpus,
> + sd_is_busy
> +};
> +
> struct sched_domain_shared {
> atomic_t ref;
> atomic_t nr_busy_cpus;
> - int has_idle_cores;
> + int state; /* see enum sd_state */
nit: s/int/enum sd_state
> };
>
> struct sched_domain {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 1cc86e76e38e..2ca37fdc6c4d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5642,11 +5642,15 @@ static inline void update_overutilized_status(struct rq *rq)
> static inline void update_overutilized_status(struct rq *rq) { }
> #endif
>
> +static int unoccupied_rq(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + return rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.idle_h_nr_running;
> +}
nit: static inline int
> +
> /* Runqueue only has SCHED_IDLE tasks enqueued */
> static int sched_idle_rq(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - return unlikely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.idle_h_nr_running &&
> - rq->nr_running);
> + return unlikely(rq->nr_running && unoccupied_rq(rq));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6197,24 +6201,44 @@ static inline int __select_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_smt_present);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
>
> -static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
> +static inline void sd_set_state(int cpu, enum sd_state state)
> {
> struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>
> sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> if (sds)
> - WRITE_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores, val);
> + WRITE_ONCE(sds->state, state);
> }
>
> -static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu)
> +static inline enum sd_state sd_get_state(int cpu)
> {
> struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>
> sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> if (sds)
> - return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
> + return READ_ONCE(sds->state);
>
> - return false;
> + return sd_has_icpus;
> +}
Why is default not sd_is_busy?
> +
> +static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int idle)
nit: Slightly confusing to call the param 'idle', since in the case it
is false we still mark icpus. Consider possibly 'core_idle'.
> +{
> + sd_set_state(cpu, idle ? sd_has_icores : sd_has_icpus);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu)
> +{
> + return sd_get_state(cpu) == sd_has_icores;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_idle_cpus(int cpu, int idle)
> +{
> + sd_set_state(cpu, idle ? sd_has_icpus : sd_is_busy);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> + return sd_get_state(cpu) != sd_is_busy;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6298,7 +6322,7 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
>
> #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
>
> -static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
> +static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int idle)
> {
> }
>
> @@ -6307,6 +6331,15 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline void set_idle_cpus(int cpu, int idle)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool test_idle_cpus(int cpu)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
> {
> return __select_idle_cpu(core, p);
> @@ -6382,7 +6415,9 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
> }
> }
>
> - if (has_idle_core)
> + if (idle_cpu == -1)
> + set_idle_cpus(target, false);
> + else if (has_idle_core)
> set_idle_cores(target, false);
>
> if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !has_idle_core) {
> @@ -6538,6 +6573,9 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
> if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> return i;
> }
> +
> + if (!has_idle_core && !test_idle_cpus(target))
> + return target;
> }
>
> i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, has_idle_core, target);
> @@ -8303,6 +8341,8 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
> unsigned long avg_load; /* Average load across all groups in sd */
> unsigned int prefer_sibling; /* tasks should go to sibling first */
>
> + int sd_state;
> +
> struct sg_lb_stats busiest_stat;/* Statistics of the busiest group */
> struct sg_lb_stats local_stat; /* Statistics of the local group */
> };
> @@ -8321,6 +8361,7 @@ static inline void init_sd_lb_stats(struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> .local = NULL,
> .total_load = 0UL,
> .total_capacity = 0UL,
> + .sd_state = sd_is_busy,
> .busiest_stat = {
> .idle_cpus = UINT_MAX,
> .group_type = group_has_spare,
> @@ -8661,6 +8702,12 @@ sched_asym(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs
> return sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, group->asym_prefer_cpu);
> }
>
> +static inline void sd_classify(struct sd_lb_stats *sds, struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + if (sds->sd_state != sd_has_icpus && unoccupied_rq(rq))
> + sds->sd_state = sd_has_icpus;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * update_sg_lb_stats - Update sched_group's statistics for load balancing.
> * @env: The load balancing environment.
> @@ -8675,11 +8722,12 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
> struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
> int *sg_status)
> {
> - int i, nr_running, local_group;
> + int i, nr_running, local_group, update_core;
>
> memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
>
> local_group = group == sds->local;
> + update_core = env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY;
Nothing special about SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY here other than you want to
do the update early on at the lowest domain level during balancing
right?
> for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_group_span(group), env->cpus) {
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> @@ -8692,6 +8740,9 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
> nr_running = rq->nr_running;
> sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
>
> + if (update_core)
> + sd_classify(sds, rq);
> +
> if (nr_running > 1)
> *sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD;
>
> @@ -9220,6 +9271,12 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
> return idlest;
> }
>
> +static void sd_update_state(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> +{
> + if (sds->sd_state == sd_has_icpus && !test_idle_cpus(env->dst_cpu))
> + set_idle_cpus(env->dst_cpu, true);
> +}
We're only setting state to has_icpus here in sd_update_state. That
doesn't feel good enough, since we're only updating state for
env->dst_cpu; all the other per-cpu state will remain stale (ie.
falsely sd_is_busy).
I think you also want a case in __update_idle_core() to call
set_idle_cores(core, 0) in the case where we have a non-idle sibling,
since we want to at least mark has_icpus even if the entire core isn't
idle.
Still, that doesn't feel quite good enough, since we're only updating
the per_cpu sd state for the given cpu. That seems like it will
frequently leave us with idle cpus, and select_idle_sibling() skipping
select_idle_cpu due to a false negative from test_idle_cpus(). Am I
missing something there?
> +
> /**
> * update_sd_lb_stats - Update sched_domain's statistics for load balancing.
> * @env: The load balancing environment.
> @@ -9270,8 +9327,9 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> /* Tag domain that child domain prefers tasks go to siblings first */
> sds->prefer_sibling = child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
>
> -
> - if (env->sd->flags & SD_NUMA)
> + if (env->sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY)
> + sd_update_state(env, sds);
> + else if (env->sd->flags & SD_NUMA)
> env->fbq_type = fbq_classify_group(&sds->busiest_stat);
>
> if (!env->sd->parent) {
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists