linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: eliminate code-block warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:20:25 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Harinder Singh <sharinder@...gle.com>,
        Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: eliminate code-block warnings

Hi Mauro,

On 6/28/22 00:17, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sat, 25 Jun 2022 08:12:00 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> escreveu:
> 
>>> So which version of Sphinx are you using?  The language argument became
>>> optional in 2.0, so you'd need to be running something pretty ancient to
>>> see this.
>>>
>>> Ah, I see 1.8.5 in your later message...how wedded are you to that
>>> version?  
>>
>> It's what ships with OpenSuse Leap 15.3, which I have been using for quite
>> a long time.
>>
>> I see that there is now OpenSuse Leap 15.4, so I could upgrade to that,
>> but I don't know what version on Sphinx it uses.
> 
> It seems that there are two versions on it, packaged with different
> names:
> 
> 2.3.1:
> 	https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.4/repo/oss/noarch/python3-Sphinx-2.3.1-150400.1.7.noarch.rpm
> 4.2.0:
> 	https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.4/repo/oss/noarch/python3-Sphinx_4_2_0-4.2.0-150400.11.6.noarch.rpm
> 
> It should be noticed that, while we don't decide to remove support for
> Sphinx < 3, kernel-doc has two different outputs, depending on Sphinx C
> domain support. The legacy support is enabled with version < 3 [1].
> 
> As we're currently discussing dropping support for Sphinx version < 3,
> I would recommend you to use the 4.2 package.
> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
> 
> [1] Version 3.0 is a bad choice, as the C domain is partially broken.

Thanks for the info. I'll take care of it.

-- 
~Randy