[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220628101532.1be4a9df@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:15:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net : rps : supoort a single flow to use rps
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:31:12 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > how to use:
> > echo xxx > /sys/class/net/xxx/queues/rx-x/rps_cpus
> > echo 1 > /sys/class/net/xxx/queues/rx-x/rps_single_flow
> > and create a flow node with the function:
> > rps_flow_node_create
>
> Which part calls rps_flow_node_create() exactly ?
>
> This seems to be very specialized to IPSEC.
>
> Can IPSEC use multiple threads for decryption ?
+1 Doesn't wireguard do something to spread the load across CPUs?
Maybe it can be generalized? I don't think a solution to "spray
crypto around" belongs as part of RPS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists