[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae4b19a2-0315-a748-d048-6eb3ed2cc65a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:57:36 +0300
From: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, abel.vesa@....com,
abailon@...libre.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, marex@...x.de,
paul.elder@...asonboard.com, Markus.Niebel@...tq-group.com,
aford173@...il.com
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
abelvesa@...nel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 8/9] interconnect: imx: configure NoC
mode/prioriry/ext_control
Hi Peng,
On 16.06.22 10:33, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> Introduce imx_icc_noc_setting structure to describe a master port setting
> Pass imx_icc_noc_setting as a parameter from specific driver
> Set priority level, mode, ext control in imx_icc_node_set
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c | 2 +-
> drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
> index 78557fe6da2c..bd728caf2b85 100644
[..]
> @@ -37,8 +40,24 @@ static int imx_icc_node_set(struct icc_node *node)
> {
> struct device *dev = node->provider->dev;
> struct imx_icc_node *node_data = node->data;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + u32 prio;
> u64 freq;
>
> + if (node_data->setting && !node_data->setting->ignore && node->peak_bw) {
> + base = node_data->setting->reg + node_data->imx_provider->noc_base;
> + if (node_data->setting->mode == IMX_NOC_MODE_FIXED) {
> + prio = node_data->setting->prio_level;
> + prio = PRIORITY_COMP_MARK | (prio << 8) | prio;
> + writel(prio, base + IMX_NOC_PRIO_REG);
> + writel(node_data->setting->mode, base + IMX_NOC_MODE_REG);
> + writel(node_data->setting->ext_control, base + IMX_NOC_EXT_CTL_REG);
> + } else {
> + dev_info(dev, "mode: %d not supported\n", node_data->setting->mode);
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
Nit: I believe that -EOPNOTSUPP is the preferred error code.
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!node_data->qos_dev)
> return 0;
>
[..]
> @@ -237,7 +263,8 @@ static int get_max_node_id(struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int nodes_count)
> }
>
> int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int nodes_count)
> + struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int nodes_count,
> + struct imx_icc_noc_setting *settings)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct icc_onecell_data *data;
> @@ -267,13 +294,19 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> provider->dev->of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, imx_provider);
>
> + if (settings) {
> + imx_provider->noc_base = devm_of_iomap(dev, provider->dev->of_node, 0, NULL);
> + if (!imx_provider->noc_base)
devm_of_iomap() returns ERR_PTR(). So we should check it with IS_ERR().
Thanks,
Georgi
> + return PTR_ERR(imx_provider->noc_base);
> + }
> +
> ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "error adding interconnect provider: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = imx_icc_register_nodes(imx_provider, nodes, nodes_count);
> + ret = imx_icc_register_nodes(imx_provider, nodes, nodes_count, settings);
> if (ret)
> goto provider_del;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists