lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:47:44 -0300
From:   Tales <tales.aparecida@...il.com>
To:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Cc:     javierm@...hat.com, davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        Maíra Canal <maira.canal@....br>,
        isabbasso@...eup.net, magalilemes00@...il.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KUnit tests for RGB565 conversion

Em seg., 27 de jun. de 2022 às 13:13, José Expósito
<jose.exposito89@...il.com> escreveu:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This series is a follow up of the XRGB8888 to RGB332 conversion KUnit tests.
>
> The first 3 patches refactor the existing test to make them agnostic of the target format and add support for "swab".
>
> The last patch adds the RGB565 conversion values, and shows how more formats will be easily added in the future.
>
> Thank you very much in advance for your feedback,
> José Expósito
>
> José Expósito (4):
>   drm/format-helper: Rename test cases to make them more generic
>   drm/format-helper: Transform tests to be agnostic of target format
>   drm/format-helper: Add support for conversion functions with swab
>   drm/format-helper: Add KUnit tests for drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_rgb565()
>
>  .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c    | 231 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 196 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 6fde8eec71796f3534f0c274066862829813b21f
> prerequisite-patch-id: 8a16f4c8004d6161035eaea275c8eafaa0ac927e
> prerequisite-patch-id: 53fded2a49e6212b546db76ec52563a683752e65
> prerequisite-patch-id: 294b0ca27a6ee57096c8f097c0572336b8a2d583
> prerequisite-patch-id: 5e05bfc5287d16c207bfc616b2776ad72eb4ab29
> prerequisite-patch-id: e94560be85dffb62a5b3cf58d1f0fc3d278ad806
> prerequisite-patch-id: a471df39c7b32c69dd2b138a7d0af015ea42e00a
> --
> 2.25.1


Tested with "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run
--kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests --arch=x86_64", "... --arch=i386"
and baremetal on x86_64 to be sure; everything looks fine, but I feel
like some patches could be squashed, though.

Tested-by: Tales L. Aparecida <tales.aparecida@...il.com>

Inspiring work, José, keep it up!
Best regards, Tales

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ