linux-kernel - [RFC net-next v3 17/29] io_uring: complete notifiers in tw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:56:39 +0100
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, kernel-team@...com,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next v3 17/29] io_uring: complete notifiers in tw

We need a task context to post CQEs but using wq is too expensive.
Try to complete notifiers using task_work and fall back to wq if fails.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 422ff835bf36..9ade0ea8552b 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ struct io_notif {
 	/* hook into ctx->notif_list and ctx->notif_list_locked */
 	struct list_head	cache_node;
 
+	/* complete via tw if ->task is non-NULL, fallback to wq otherwise */
+	struct task_struct	*task;
 	union {
 		struct callback_head	task_work;
 		struct work_struct	commit_work;
@@ -2802,6 +2804,11 @@ static void __io_notif_complete_tw(struct callback_head *cb)
 	struct io_notif *notif = container_of(cb, struct io_notif, task_work);
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = notif->ctx;
 
+	if (likely(notif->task)) {
+		io_put_task(notif->task, 1);
+		notif->task = NULL;
+	}
+
 	spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
 	io_fill_cqe_aux(ctx, notif->tag, 0, notif->seq);
 
@@ -2835,6 +2842,14 @@ static void io_uring_tx_zerocopy_callback(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&uarg->refcnt))
 		return;
+
+	if (likely(notif->task)) {
+		init_task_work(&notif->task_work, __io_notif_complete_tw);
+		if (likely(!task_work_add(notif->task, &notif->task_work,
+					  TWA_SIGNAL)))
+			return;
+	}
+
 	INIT_WORK(&notif->commit_work, io_notif_complete_wq);
 	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &notif->commit_work);
 }
@@ -2946,8 +2961,12 @@ static __cold int io_notif_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	for (i = 0; i < ctx->nr_notif_slots; i++) {
 		struct io_notif_slot *slot = &ctx->notif_slots[i];
 
-		if (slot->notif)
+		if (slot->notif) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(slot->notif->task);
+
+			slot->notif->task = NULL;
 			io_notif_slot_flush(slot);
+		}
 	}
 
 	kvfree(ctx->notif_slots);
-- 
2.36.1