| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHS8izM-xWCA6EuZP4=n3sg4OSVuD_NMJS6gCZHbLs7YN8Z+cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:25:26 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>,
Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@...anix.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/26] hugetlb: add hugetlb_pte to track HugeTLB page
table entries
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:37 AM James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> After high-granularity mapping, page table entries for HugeTLB pages can
> be of any size/type. (For example, we can have a 1G page mapped with a
> mix of PMDs and PTEs.) This struct is to help keep track of a HugeTLB
> PTE after we have done a page table walk.
>
> Without this, we'd have to pass around the "size" of the PTE everywhere.
> We effectively did this before; it could be fetched from the hstate,
> which we pass around pretty much everywhere.
>
> This commit includes definitions for some basic helper functions that
> are used later. These helper functions wrap existing PTE
> inspection/modification functions, where the correct version is picked
> depending on if the HugeTLB PTE is actually "huge" or not. (Previously,
> all HugeTLB PTEs were "huge").
>
> For example, hugetlb_ptep_get wraps huge_ptep_get and ptep_get, where
> ptep_get is used when the HugeTLB PTE is PAGE_SIZE, and huge_ptep_get is
> used in all other cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 5fe1db46d8c9..1d4ec9dfdebf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,68 @@ enum {
> __NR_USED_SUBPAGE,
> };
>
> +struct hugetlb_pte {
> + pte_t *ptep;
> + unsigned int shift;
> +};
> +
> +static inline
> +void hugetlb_pte_init(struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + hpte->ptep = NULL;
shift = 0; ?
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +void hugetlb_pte_populate(struct hugetlb_pte *hpte, pte_t *ptep,
> + unsigned int shift)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!ptep);
> + hpte->ptep = ptep;
> + hpte->shift = shift;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +unsigned long hugetlb_pte_size(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + return 1UL << hpte->shift;
> +}
> +
This helper is quite redundant in my opinion.
> +static inline
> +unsigned long hugetlb_pte_mask(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + return ~(hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +unsigned int hugetlb_pte_shift(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + return hpte->shift;
> +}
> +
This one jumps as quite redundant too.
> +static inline
> +bool hugetlb_pte_huge(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + return !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HUGETLB_HIGH_GRANULARITY_MAPPING) ||
> + hugetlb_pte_shift(hpte) > PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
I'm guessing the !IS_ENABLED() check is because only the HGM code
would store a non-huge pte in a hugetlb_pte struct. I think it's a bit
fragile because anyone can add code in the future that uses
hugetlb_pte in unexpected ways, but I will concede that it is correct
as written.
> +static inline
> +void hugetlb_pte_copy(struct hugetlb_pte *dest, const struct hugetlb_pte *src)
> +{
> + dest->ptep = src->ptep;
> + dest->shift = src->shift;
> +}
> +
> +bool hugetlb_pte_present_leaf(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte);
> +bool hugetlb_pte_none(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte);
> +bool hugetlb_pte_none_mostly(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte);
> +pte_t hugetlb_ptep_get(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte);
> +void hugetlb_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte,
> + unsigned long address);
> +
> struct hugepage_subpool {
> spinlock_t lock;
> long count;
> @@ -1130,6 +1192,28 @@ static inline spinlock_t *huge_pte_lock_shift(unsigned int shift,
> return ptl;
> }
>
> +static inline
Maybe for organization, move all the static functions you're adding
above the hugetlb_pte_* declarations you're adding?
> +spinlock_t *hugetlb_pte_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> +
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + // Only use huge_pte_lockptr if we are at leaf-level. Otherwise use
> + // the regular page table lock.
Does checkpatch.pl not complain about // style comments? I think those
are not allowed, no?
> + if (hugetlb_pte_none(hpte) || hugetlb_pte_present_leaf(hpte))
> + return huge_pte_lockptr(hugetlb_pte_shift(hpte),
> + mm, hpte->ptep);
> + return &mm->page_table_lock;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +spinlock_t *hugetlb_pte_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + spinlock_t *ptl = hugetlb_pte_lockptr(mm, hpte);
> +
> + spin_lock(ptl);
> + return ptl;
> +}
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE) && defined(CONFIG_CMA)
> extern void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order);
> extern void __init hugetlb_cma_check(void);
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index d6d0d4c03def..1a1434e29740 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,63 @@ static bool vma_has_reserves(struct vm_area_struct *vma, long chg)
> return false;
> }
>
> +bool hugetlb_pte_present_leaf(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + pgd_t pgd;
> + p4d_t p4d;
> + pud_t pud;
> + pmd_t pmd;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + if (hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) >= PGDIR_SIZE) {
> + pgd = *(pgd_t *)hpte->ptep;
> + return pgd_present(pgd) && pgd_leaf(pgd);
> + } else if (hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) >= P4D_SIZE) {
> + p4d = *(p4d_t *)hpte->ptep;
> + return p4d_present(p4d) && p4d_leaf(p4d);
> + } else if (hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) >= PUD_SIZE) {
> + pud = *(pud_t *)hpte->ptep;
> + return pud_present(pud) && pud_leaf(pud);
> + } else if (hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) >= PMD_SIZE) {
> + pmd = *(pmd_t *)hpte->ptep;
> + return pmd_present(pmd) && pmd_leaf(pmd);
> + } else if (hugetlb_pte_size(hpte) >= PAGE_SIZE)
> + return pte_present(*hpte->ptep);
The use of >= is a bit curious to me. Shouldn't these be ==?
Also probably doesn't matter but I was thinking to use *_SHIFTs
instead of *_SIZE so you don't have to calculate the size 5 times in
this routine, or calculate hugetlb_pte_size() once for some less code
duplication and re-use?
> + BUG();
> +}
> +
> +bool hugetlb_pte_none(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + if (hugetlb_pte_huge(hpte))
> + return huge_pte_none(huge_ptep_get(hpte->ptep));
> + return pte_none(ptep_get(hpte->ptep));
> +}
> +
> +bool hugetlb_pte_none_mostly(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + if (hugetlb_pte_huge(hpte))
> + return huge_pte_none_mostly(huge_ptep_get(hpte->ptep));
> + return pte_none_mostly(ptep_get(hpte->ptep));
> +}
> +
> +pte_t hugetlb_ptep_get(const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte)
> +{
> + if (hugetlb_pte_huge(hpte))
> + return huge_ptep_get(hpte->ptep);
> + return ptep_get(hpte->ptep);
> +}
> +
> +void hugetlb_pte_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, const struct hugetlb_pte *hpte,
> + unsigned long address)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(!hpte->ptep);
> + unsigned long sz = hugetlb_pte_size(hpte);
> +
> + if (sz > PAGE_SIZE)
> + return huge_pte_clear(mm, address, hpte->ptep, sz);
> + return pte_clear(mm, address, hpte->ptep);
> +}
> +
> static void enqueue_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> {
> int nid = page_to_nid(page);
> --
> 2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists