linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH 04/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_xfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:49:06 +0000
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To:     bleung@...omium.org, groeck@...omium.org
Cc:     chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, tzungbi@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 04/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_xfer_command()

cros_ec_send_command() has extra logic to handle EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS.
Separate the command transfer part into cros_ec_xfer_command() so
that other functions can re-use it.

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
index b02fd1414e52..0cec013be3d3 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int prepare_tx_legacy(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
 	return EC_MSG_TX_PROTO_BYTES + msg->outsize;
 }
 
-static int cros_ec_send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, struct cros_ec_command *msg)
+static int cros_ec_xfer_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, struct cros_ec_command *msg)
 {
 	int ret;
 	int (*xfer_fxn)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, struct cros_ec_command *msg);
@@ -123,14 +123,21 @@ static int cros_ec_send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, struct cros_ec_co
 		 * the EC is trying to use protocol v2, on an underlying
 		 * communication mechanism that does not support v2.
 		 */
-		dev_err_once(ec_dev->dev,
-			     "missing EC transfer API, cannot send command\n");
+		dev_err_once(ec_dev->dev, "missing EC transfer API, cannot send command\n");
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
 	trace_cros_ec_request_start(msg);
 	ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, msg);
 	trace_cros_ec_request_done(msg, ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int cros_ec_send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, struct cros_ec_command *msg)
+{
+	int ret = cros_ec_xfer_command(ec_dev, msg);
+
 	if (msg->result == EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS) {
 		int i;
 		struct cros_ec_command *status_msg;
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog