Message-ID: <77537937-6d37-99cf-504e-1361d316eaae@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:56:20 +0530
From:   Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
To:     Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        <frederic@...nel.org>, <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, <joel@...lfernandes.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        <urezki@...il.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
        <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace
 periods further



On 6/28/2022 9:33 AM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/6/28 上午11:22, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/2022 7:44 AM, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022/6/27 下午8:37, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>>> Commit 640a7d37c3f4 ("srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited
>>>> grace periods") highlights a problem where aggressively blocking
>>>> SRCU expedited grace periods, as was introduced in commit
>>>> 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
>>>> from consuming CPU"), introduces ~2 minutes delay to the overall
>>>> ~3.5 minutes boot time, when starting VMs with "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd"
>>>> cmdline on qemu, which results in very high rate of memslots
>>>> add/remove, which causes > ~6000 synchronize_srcu() calls for
>>>> kvm->srcu SRCU instance.
>>>>
>>>> Below table captures the experiments done by Zhangfei Gao, Shameer,
>>>> to measure the boottime impact with various values of non-sleeping
>>>> per phase counts, with HZ_250 and preemption enabled:
>>>>
>>>> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
>>>> | SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE   | Boot time (s)  |
>>>> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
>>>> | 100                      | 30.053         |
>>>> | 150                      | 25.151         |
>>>> | 200                      | 20.704         |
>>>> | 250                      | 15.748         |
>>>> | 500                      | 11.401         |
>>>> | 1000                     | 11.443         |
>>>> | 10000                    | 11.258         |
>>>> | 1000000                  | 11.154         |
>>>> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
>>>>
>>>> Analysis on the experiment results showed improved boot time
>>>> with non blocking delays close to one jiffy duration. This
>>>> was also seen when number of per-phase iterations were scaled
>>>> to one jiffy.
>>>>
>>>> So, this change scales per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping
>>>> polls, soiuch that, non-sleeping polls are done for one jiffy. In 
>>>> addition
>>>> to this, srcu_get_delay() call in srcu_gp_end(), which is used to 
>>>> calculate
>>>> the delay used for scheduling callbacks, is replaced with the check for
>>>> expedited grace period. This is done, to schedule cbs for completed 
>>>> expedited
>>>> grace periods immediately, which results in improved boot time seen in
>>>> experiments.
>>>>
>>>> In addition to the changes to default per phase delays, this change
>>>> adds 3 new kernel parameters - srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay,
>>>> srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase, srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay.
>>>> This allows users to configure the srcu grace period scanning delays,
>>>> depending on their system configuration requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
>>>
>>> Test on arm64
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev
>>> 5.19-rc3
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig make defconfig CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y 
>>> CONFIG_HZ_250=y
>>>
>>
>> If it is possible to try out, do you get similar results with HZ_1000?
> 
> CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
> CONFIG_HZ=1000
> 
> with this patch
> real    0m10.560s
> user    0m3.230s
> sys    0m1.024s
> 
> Revert this patch
> real    0m44.014s
> user    0m3.005s
> sys     0m1.287s
> 

Thank you very much for this data!

>>
>>> real    0m11.498s
>>> user    0m2.911s
>>> sys    0m1.171s
>>>
>>>
>>> As comparison (Since can not directly revert on linux-rcu.git dev, so 
>>> use rc1 instead)
>>>
>>> 5.19-rc1 + Revert "srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers 
>>> from consuming CPU"
>>>
>>> real    0m8.173s
>>> user    0m3.024s
>>> sys    0m0.959s
>>>
>>> 5.19-rc1
>>> real    2m41.433s
>>>   user    0m3.097s
>>> sys     0m1.177s
>>>
>>
>> Thanks! Can I add your Tested-by in subsequent versions of the patch?
> 
> Curiously, is this treated as fixed?
> 11.498s vs. v5.18 8.173s
> 

I think it fixes the use case at least - deploy qemu VMs with flash 
emulation; however, I do not have information on, if ~11.5 seconds is 
acceptable from performance point of view, for this use case?


Thanks
Neeraj

> Thanks
> 
>>
>> The numbers are aligned to the initial experiments, without using long 
>> retry delays of 100 us. Using long delays might have impact on other
>> workloads, which could be sensitive to the delay between retries. So,
>> I didn't include that in the patch.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Neeraj
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 18 +++++
>>>>   kernel/rcu/srcutree.c                         | 79 
>>>> ++++++++++++++-----
>>>>   2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt 
>>>> b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> index af647714c113..7e34086c64f5 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>>> @@ -5805,6 +5805,24 @@
>>>>               expediting.  Set to zero to disable automatic
>>>>               expediting.
>>>> +    srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay [KNL]
>>>> +            Specifies the number of no-delay instances
>>>> +            per jiffy for which the SRCU grace period
>>>> +            worker thread will be rescheduled with zero
>>>> +            delay. Beyond this limit, worker thread will
>>>> +            be rescheduled with a sleep delay of one jiffy.
>>>> +
>>>> +    srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase [KNL]
>>>> +            Specifies the per-grace-period phase, number of
>>>> +            non-sleeping polls of readers. Beyond this limit,
>>>> +            grace period worker thread will be rescheduled
>>>> +            with a sleep delay of one jiffy, between each
>>>> +            rescan of the readers, for a grace period phase.
>>>> +
>>>> +    srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay [KNL]
>>>> +            Specifies number of microseconds of non-sleeping
>>>> +            delay between each non-sleeping poll of readers.
>>>> +
>>>>       srcutree.small_contention_lim [KNL]
>>>>               Specifies the number of update-side contention
>>>>               events per jiffy will be tolerated before
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>>>> index 0db7873f4e95..006828b9c41a 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>>>> @@ -511,10 +511,49 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct 
>>>> srcu_struct *ssp)
>>>>       return sum;
>>>>   }
>>>> -#define SRCU_INTERVAL        1    // Base delay if no expedited GPs 
>>>> pending.
>>>> -#define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL    10    // Maximum incremental delay 
>>>> from slow readers.
>>>> -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE    3    // Maximum per-GP-phase 
>>>> consecutive no-delay instances.
>>>> -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY    100    // Maximum consecutive no-delay 
>>>> instances.
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * We use an adaptive strategy for synchronize_srcu() and 
>>>> especially for
>>>> + * synchronize_srcu_expedited().  We spin for a fixed time period
>>>> + * (defined below, boot time configurable) to allow SRCU readers to 
>>>> exit
>>>> + * their read-side critical sections.  If there are still some readers
>>>> + * after one jiffy, we repeatedly block for one jiffy time periods.
>>>> + * The blocking time is increased as the grace-period age increases,
>>>> + * with max blocking time capped at 10 jiffies.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY        5
>>>> +
>>>> +static ulong srcu_retry_check_delay = SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY;
>>>> +module_param(srcu_retry_check_delay, ulong, 0444);
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SRCU_INTERVAL        1        // Base delay if no expedited 
>>>> GPs pending.
>>>> +#define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL    10        // Maximum incremental delay 
>>>> from slow readers.
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_LO    3UL    // Lowmark on 
>>>> default per-GP-phase
>>>> +                            // no-delay instances.
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_HI    1000UL    // Highmark 
>>>> on default per-GP-phase
>>>> +                            // no-delay instances.
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SRCU_UL_CLAMP_LO(val, low)    ((val) > (low) ? (val) : (low))
>>>> +#define SRCU_UL_CLAMP_HI(val, high)    ((val) < (high) ? (val) : 
>>>> (high))
>>>> +// per-GP-phase no-delay instances adjusted to allow non-sleeping 
>>>> poll upto
>>>> +// one jiffies time duration. Mult by 2 is done to factor in the 
>>>> srcu_get_delay()
>>>> +// called from process_srcu().
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_ADJUSTED    \
>>>> +    (2UL * USEC_PER_SEC / HZ / SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY)
>>>> +
>>>> +// Maximum per-GP-phase consecutive no-delay instances.
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE    (    \
>>>> + 
>>>> SRCU_UL_CLAMP_HI(SRCU_UL_CLAMP_LO(SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_ADJUSTED, 
>>>> \
>>>> +                      SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_LO), \
>>>> +             SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE_HI))
>>>> +
>>>> +static ulong srcu_max_nodelay_phase = SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE;
>>>> +module_param(srcu_max_nodelay_phase, ulong, 0444);
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY    100    // Maximum consecutive 
>>>> no-delay instances.
>>>> +
>>>> +static ulong srcu_max_nodelay = SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY;
>>>> +module_param(srcu_max_nodelay, ulong, 0444);
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * Return grace-period delay, zero if there are expedited grace
>>>> @@ -535,7 +574,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct 
>>>> srcu_struct *ssp)
>>>>               jbase += j - gpstart;
>>>>           if (!jbase) {
>>>>               WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay, 
>>>> READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1);
>>>> -            if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > 
>>>> SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE)
>>>> +            if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > 
>>>> srcu_max_nodelay_phase)
>>>>                   jbase = 1;
>>>>           }
>>>>       }
>>>> @@ -612,15 +651,6 @@ void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct 
>>>> *ssp, int idx)
>>>>   }
>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
>>>> -/*
>>>> - * We use an adaptive strategy for synchronize_srcu() and 
>>>> especially for
>>>> - * synchronize_srcu_expedited().  We spin for a fixed time period
>>>> - * (defined below) to allow SRCU readers to exit their read-side 
>>>> critical
>>>> - * sections.  If there are still some readers after a few 
>>>> microseconds,
>>>> - * we repeatedly block for 1-millisecond time periods.
>>>> - */
>>>> -#define SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY        5
>>>> -
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * Start an SRCU grace period.
>>>>    */
>>>> @@ -706,7 +736,7 @@ static void srcu_schedule_cbs_snp(struct 
>>>> srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_node *snp
>>>>    */
>>>>   static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    unsigned long cbdelay;
>>>> +    unsigned long cbdelay = 1;
>>>>       bool cbs;
>>>>       bool last_lvl;
>>>>       int cpu;
>>>> @@ -726,7 +756,9 @@ static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>>>>       spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp);
>>>>       idx = rcu_seq_state(ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
>>>>       WARN_ON_ONCE(idx != SRCU_STATE_SCAN2);
>>>> -    cbdelay = !!srcu_get_delay(ssp);
>>>> +    if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq), 
>>>> READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp)))
>>>> +        cbdelay = 0;
>>>> +
>>>>       WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_last_gp_end, ktime_get_mono_fast_ns());
>>>>       rcu_seq_end(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
>>>>       gpseq = rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
>>>> @@ -927,12 +959,16 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct 
>>>> srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_data *sdp,
>>>>    */
>>>>   static bool try_check_zero(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, int 
>>>> trycount)
>>>>   {
>>>> +    unsigned long curdelay;
>>>> +
>>>> +    curdelay = !srcu_get_delay(ssp);
>>>> +
>>>>       for (;;) {
>>>>           if (srcu_readers_active_idx_check(ssp, idx))
>>>>               return true;
>>>> -        if (--trycount + !srcu_get_delay(ssp) <= 0)
>>>> +        if ((--trycount + curdelay) <= 0)
>>>>               return false;
>>>> -        udelay(SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY);
>>>> +        udelay(srcu_retry_check_delay);
>>>>       }
>>>>   }
>>>> @@ -1588,7 +1624,7 @@ static void process_srcu(struct work_struct 
>>>> *work)
>>>>           j = jiffies;
>>>>           if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_jiffies) == j) {
>>>>               WRITE_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count, 
>>>> READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) + 1);
>>>> -            if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY)
>>>> +            if (READ_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count) > srcu_max_nodelay)
>>>>                   curdelay = 1;
>>>>           } else {
>>>>               WRITE_ONCE(ssp->reschedule_count, 1);
>>>> @@ -1680,6 +1716,11 @@ static int __init srcu_bootup_announce(void)
>>>>       pr_info("Hierarchical SRCU implementation.\n");
>>>>       if (exp_holdoff != DEFAULT_SRCU_EXP_HOLDOFF)
>>>>           pr_info("\tNon-default auto-expedite holdoff of %lu 
>>>> ns.\n", exp_holdoff);
>>>> +    if (srcu_retry_check_delay != SRCU_DEFAULT_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY)
>>>> +        pr_info("\tNon-default retry check delay of %lu us.\n", 
>>>> srcu_retry_check_delay);
>>>> +    if (srcu_max_nodelay != SRCU_DEFAULT_MAX_NODELAY)
>>>> +        pr_info("\tNon-default max no-delay of %lu.\n", 
>>>> srcu_max_nodelay);
>>>> +    pr_info("\tMax phase no-delay instances is %lu.\n", 
>>>> srcu_max_nodelay_phase);
>>>>       return 0;
>>>>   }
>>>>   early_initcall(srcu_bootup_announce);
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists