[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrqbNfF9uYMSwZ4V@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:09:57 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "yangx.jy@...itsu.com" <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report from blktests nvme/032] WARNING: possible circular
locking dependency detected
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:03:55AM +0000, yangx.jy@...itsu.com wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Running blktests nvme/032 on kernel v5.19-rc2+ which enables
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING triggered the below WARNING.
>
> What was happening when this trace was created? It looks like you were
> manually removing a PCI device from the system through sysfs? Why would
> blktests do that?
To test how the block layer copes with the fact that the underlying
device goes away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists