| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YrqqMYcqN8L+1Yfe@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:13:53 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] habanalabs: enable gaudi2 code in driver
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:05:42AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:29 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:26:20PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > Enable the Gaudi2 ASIC code in the pci probe callback of the driver so
> > > the driver will handle Gaudi2 ASICs.
> > >
> > > Add the PCI ID to the PCI table and add the ASIC enum value to all
> > > relevant places.
> > >
> > > Fixup the device parameters initialization for Gaudi2.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c | 8 +++
> > > drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h | 13 ++--
> > > .../misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_drv.c | 67 +++++++++++++++----
> > > drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/sysfs.c | 6 ++
> > > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c
> > > index 38cf2f1659ee..a4656eac495e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/device.c
> > > @@ -645,6 +645,14 @@ static int device_early_init(struct hl_device *hdev)
> > > gaudi_set_asic_funcs(hdev);
> > > strscpy(hdev->asic_name, "GAUDI SEC", sizeof(hdev->asic_name));
> > > break;
> > > + case ASIC_GAUDI2:
> > > + gaudi2_set_asic_funcs(hdev);
> > > + strscpy(hdev->asic_name, "GAUDI2", sizeof(hdev->asic_name));
> > > + break;
> > > + case ASIC_GAUDI2_SEC:
> > > + gaudi2_set_asic_funcs(hdev);
> > > + strscpy(hdev->asic_name, "GAUDI2 SEC", sizeof(hdev->asic_name));
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > dev_err(hdev->dev, "Unrecognized ASIC type %d\n",
> > > hdev->asic_type);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h
> > > index 4537845658f8..587b1c537115 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/common/habanalabs.h
> > > @@ -3033,7 +3033,6 @@ struct hl_reset_info {
> > > * @disabled: is device disabled.
> > > * @late_init_done: is late init stage was done during initialization.
> > > * @hwmon_initialized: is H/W monitor sensors was initialized.
> > > - * @heartbeat: is heartbeat sanity check towards CPU-CP enabled.
> >
> > You remove this field, but you still keep it in the structure, you just
> > move it later down to the bottom for some reason:
> >
> > > * @reset_on_lockup: true if a reset should be done in case of stuck CS, false
> > > * otherwise.
> > > * @dram_default_page_mapping: is DRAM default page mapping enabled.
> > > @@ -3066,6 +3065,10 @@ struct hl_reset_info {
> > > * @is_compute_ctx_active: Whether there is an active compute context executing.
> > > * @compute_ctx_in_release: true if the current compute context is being released.
> > > * @supports_mmu_prefetch: true if prefetch is supported, otherwise false.
> > > + * @reset_upon_device_release: reset the device when the user closes the file descriptor of the
> > > + * device.
> > > + * @skip_iatu_for_unsecured_device: skip the device PCI controller initialization when working
> > > + * with device that runs f/w that is not secured.
> > > */
> > > struct hl_device {
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > @@ -3175,7 +3178,6 @@ struct hl_device {
> > > u8 disabled;
> > > u8 late_init_done;
> > > u8 hwmon_initialized;
> > > - u8 heartbeat;
> > > u8 reset_on_lockup;
> > > u8 dram_default_page_mapping;
> > > u8 memory_scrub;
> > > @@ -3199,6 +3201,8 @@ struct hl_device {
> > > u8 is_compute_ctx_active;
> > > u8 compute_ctx_in_release;
> > > u8 supports_mmu_prefetch;
> > > + u8 reset_upon_device_release;
> > > + u8 skip_iatu_for_unsecured_device;
> > >
> > > /* Parameters for bring-up */
> > > u64 nic_ports_mask;
> > > @@ -3212,11 +3216,9 @@ struct hl_device {
> > > u8 dram_scrambler_enable;
> > > u8 hard_reset_on_fw_events;
> > > u8 bmc_enable;
> > > - u8 rl_enable;
> > > u8 reset_on_preboot_fail;
> > > - u8 reset_upon_device_release;
> > > - u8 skip_iatu_for_unsecured_device;
> > > u8 reset_if_device_not_idle;
> > > + u8 heartbeat;
> > > };
> >
> > Did you mean to do that?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Yes, I meant to do that. There are (currently) 13 variables under the
> comment of "bring-up" parameters.
> These parameters are used all over our code and in our internal
> package we expose them as kernel module parameters for us to play with
> to help with bring-ups and testing on palladium.
> But in the upstream driver, I just set them to fixed values and I
> remove the comments as I don't want anyone to play with them. And of
> course I don't expose them as kernel params.
>
> The alternative is to remove their usage from all over the code but
> this will create for me a serious headache when taking patches and
> upstreaming them, because the code will be very different from our
> internal development tree.
>
> After I explained all the above, I think I'll just add the comments
> anyway, to make this documentation complete. I hope this will remove
> any future confusion.
Just keep the comments, that makes it easier to understand.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists