linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add Lenovo Thinkpad X13s devicetree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00aefa9b-5d91-629b-9fa6-fadd6df5a469@somainline.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:09:57 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add Lenovo Thinkpad X13s
 devicetree



On 28.06.2022 10:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 01:38:47PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 22.06.2022 15:26, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Add an initial devicetree for the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s with support for
>>> USB, backlight, keyboard, touchpad, touchscreen (to be verified), PMICs
>>> and remoteprocs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Krzysztof's tag wasn't here in the version I posted.
Patchwork recently started pulling them in automatically when
downloading a mbox file.

Konrad
> 
>>> +	reserved-memory {
>>> +	};
>> You still haven't explained this weird node (I don't believe
>> the thing doesn't mind you poking at 'secure' regions, and even
>> if otherwise, it is unused for now).
> 
> It's just unused for now, so sure, we can remove it until we need it.
> 
> Johan