[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b44b2b4a-20e2-2d42-22b1-c1e44c6f999d@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:16:23 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
CC: "mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Show the last unloaded module's taint flag(s)
Le 28/06/2022 à 09:47, Aaron Tomlin a écrit :
> On Tue 2022-06-28 05:54 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> - /* Store the name of the last unloaded module for diagnostic purposes */
>>> strlcpy(last_unloaded_module, mod->name, sizeof(last_unloaded_module));
>>> + strcat(last_unloaded_module, module_flags(mod, buf, false));
>>
>> You replace a bounded string copy by an unbounded strict contat.
>>
>> Should you use strlcat() instead ?
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Why? If I understand correctly, both the destination and source string are
> NULL-terminated (see module_flags()). So, strcat() should be sufficient.
>
Are you sure you will never ever end up with a string longer than the
length of last_unloaded_module ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists