linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/12] habanalabs: add unsupported functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFCwf10zem5VSa-2AfZtQW4W3Vm+d-jqkiiyyHeEijfrSd6Q0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:20:40 +0300
From:   Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] habanalabs: add unsupported functions

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:34 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:26:12PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > There are a number of new ASIC-specific functions that were added
> > for Gaudi2. To make the common code work, we need to define empty
> > implementations of those functions for Goya and Gaudi.
> >
> > Some functions will return error if called with Goya/Gaudi.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c   | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > index ae894335e9f8..f4581220ecd5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > @@ -8588,6 +8588,11 @@ static void gaudi_ctx_fini(struct hl_ctx *ctx)
> >       gaudi_internal_cb_pool_fini(ctx->hdev, ctx);
> >  }
> >
> > +int gaudi_pre_schedule_cs(struct hl_cs *cs)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> static?
>
> Did you run sparse on this change?
Not on this change specifically. Sorry, will run on the entire code.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h