linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v9 09/11] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527687EE83BC26F08A7D99908CB89@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:29:09 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jean-Philippe Brucker" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 09/11] iommu: Prepare IOMMU domain for IOPF

> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 10:44 PM
> +/*
> + * I/O page fault handler for SVA
> + */
> +enum iommu_page_response_code
> +iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *data)
> +{
> +	vm_fault_t ret;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	unsigned int access_flags = 0;
> +	struct iommu_domain *domain = data;
> +	unsigned int fault_flags = FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE;
> +	struct iommu_fault_page_request *prm = &fault->prm;
> +	enum iommu_page_response_code status =
> IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID;
> +
> +	if (!(prm->flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID))
> +		return status;
> +
> +	mm = domain->mm;

What about directly passing domain->mm in as the fault data?

The entire logic here is only about mm instead of domain.