[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0155aeb-b209-07e1-747a-594a755f54fc@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:08:38 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/31] soc/tegra: Migrate to dev_pm_opp_set_config()
On 6/28/22 10:09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-06-22, 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 27-06-22, 10:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> 27.06.2022 09:45, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>>>> Looks okay. If you'll solve the cpufreq problem where OPP config is set
>>>>> by two drivers for the same cpu device
>>>> This is supported, there is some early freeing of resources on the
>>>> removal path though, the reasoning for which I already gave in another
>>>> email. Though, I am open to sorting that out as well, but nothing
>>>> breaks the code for now AFAICT.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In case of Tegra, we use tegra-cpufreq driver that sets supported_hw and
>>> registers cpufreq-dt. If cpufreq-dt driver defers the probe, then the
>>> supported_hw will be lost on the re-probe. I haven't checked yet, but I
>>> suppose that cpufreq-dt driver defers on Tegra30 because of the CPU
>>> regulator and that's why we get the "OPP table is missing" error.
>>
>> Aha, I get it now. I see, this is a real problem. Will fix it. Give me
>> some time to think. Thanks.
>
> Okay, I fixed this in opp/linux-next, can you or Jon please give it a
> go on tegra30 to see if the issue is fixed ?
>
> FWIW, I have fixed this with the IDR API and the OPP core will only
> free the resources in clear-config, that the corresponding set-config
> has configured. I have tested it with the clk API only though.
>
> Once you confirm, I will resend all the patches and hope no issues are
> left here.
>
> Thanks for helping out guys. Really appreciate it.
>
The opp/linux-next works fine, thank you.
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
BTW, the idr_alloc() is obsoleted by xa_alloc().
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists