[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrrZvEOiiwCo0Xsm@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:36:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/11] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: Fix spelling in the
comment
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:56:31AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:33:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > > - * There is known hw bug. Upon reset BIT 5 of register
> > > > + * There is known HW bug. Upon reset BIT 5 of register
> > >
> > > You may as well fix the grammar while you're at it.
> >
> > Any suggestion from a native speaker? I can propose a few changes, but I'm
> > totally unsure.
>
> No massive changes, just:
>
> * There is a known H/W bug. Upon reset, BIT 5 of register
> - --- -
>
> > > > * BXTWC_CHGR_LVL1_IRQ is 0 which is the expected value. However,
> > > > * later it's set to 1(masked) automatically by hardware. So we
> > > > - * have the software workaround here to unmaksed it in order to let
> > > > - * charger interrutp work.
> > > > + * have the software workaround here to unmasked it in order to let
> > > > + * charger interrupt work.
>
> * place a software workaround here to unmask it again in order to re-enable
> ------- ------ ----- ---------
>
> * the charger interrupt.
> ---
>
> Something like that. Feel free to adapt it further as you see fit.
Thank you, Lee, I will do as suggested!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists