[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220629184708.x5exgjoy4sblyqml@bogus>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 19:47:08 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
atishp@...shpatra.org, atishp@...osinc.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
wangqing@...o.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
ionela.voinescu@....com, pierre.gondois@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, gshan@...hat.com,
Valentina.FernandezAlanis@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/19] arch_topology: Use the last level cache
information from the cacheinfo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 06:18:25PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 29/06/2022 18:49, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > On 27/06/2022 17:50, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>
> >> The cacheinfo is now initialised early along with the CPU topology
> >> initialisation. Instead of relying on the LLC ID information parsed
> >> separately only with ACPI PPTT elsewhere, migrate to use the similar
> >> information from the cacheinfo.
> >>
> >> This is generic for both DT and ACPI systems. The ACPI LLC ID information
> >> parsed separately can now be removed from arch specific code.
> >
> > Hey Sudeep,
> > I bisected broken boot on PolarFire SoC to this patch in next-20220629 :/
> > I suspect the issue is a missing "next-level-cache" in the the dt:
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
Good that I included this in -next, I had not received any feedback from
RISC-V even after 5 iterations. I also see this DTS is very odd. It also
states CPU0 doesn't have L1-D$ while the other 4 CPUs have L1-D$. Is that
a mistake or is it the reality ? Another breakage in userspace cacheinfo
sysfs entry of cpu0 has both I$ and D$.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists