[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220629192045.4107237-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:20:45 -0400
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: sre@...nel.org, asmaa@...dia.com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] power: reset: pwr-mlxbf: change rst_pwr_hid and low_pwr_hid from global to local variables
sparse reports
drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c:19:12: warning: symbol 'rst_pwr_hid' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c:20:12: warning: symbol 'low_pwr_hid' was not declared. Should it be static?
Both rst_pwr_hid and low_pwr_hid are only used in a single function
so they should be local variables.
Fixes: a4c0094fcf76 ("power: reset: pwr-mlxbf: add BlueField SoC power control driver")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c b/drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c
index 1c4904c0e1f5..12dedf841a44 100644
--- a/drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c
+++ b/drivers/power/reset/pwr-mlxbf.c
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
-const char *rst_pwr_hid = "MLNXBF24";
-const char *low_pwr_hid = "MLNXBF29";
-
struct pwr_mlxbf {
struct work_struct send_work;
const char *hid;
@@ -31,6 +28,8 @@ static void pwr_mlxbf_send_work(struct work_struct *work)
static irqreturn_t pwr_mlxbf_irq(int irq, void *ptr)
{
+ const char *rst_pwr_hid = "MLNXBF24";
+ const char *low_pwr_hid = "MLNXBF29";
struct pwr_mlxbf *priv = ptr;
if (!strncmp(priv->hid, rst_pwr_hid, 8))
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists