[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrysUpY4mdzA0h76@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:47:30 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
CC: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"jordan@...micpenguin.net" <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"alyssa@...enzweig.io" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"yangyingliang@...wei.com" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
"orsonzhai@...il.com" <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
"gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com" <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"marcan@...can.st" <marcan@...can.st>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolin.wang7@...il.com" <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible
domain and device/group
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 03:19:43PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 06:35:49PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
>
> > > > It's not used in VFIO context. "return 0" just satisfy the iommu
> > > > framework to go ahead. and yes, here we only allow the shared
> > > > "mapping-domain" (All the devices share a domain created
> > > > internally).
>
> What part of the iommu framework is trying to attach a domain and
> wants to see success when the domain was not actually attached ?
>
> > > What prevent this driver from being used in VFIO context?
> >
> > Nothing prevent this. Just I didn't test.
>
> This is why it is wrong to return success here.
Hi Yong, would you or someone you know be able to confirm whether
this "return 0" is still a must or not?
Considering that it's an old 32-bit platform for MTK, if it would
take time to do so, I'd like to drop the change in MTK driver and
note in commit log for you or other MTK folks to change in future.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists