[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n50PGw_XSZ0-iV7gem6+-LENoq6ZVOwX3f+0XjkrHg-rLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:15:19 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, quic_ppratap@...cinc.com,
quic_vpulyala@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 2/5] usb: dwc3: core: Host wake up support from system suspend
Quoting Pavan Kondeti (2022-06-27 22:31:48)
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 01:02:49PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Pavan Kondeti (2022-06-20 01:54:15)
> > >
> > > Would like to hear other people thoughts on this.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not following very closely but it sounds like a problem that may be
> > solved by using the component driver code (see
> > include/linux/component.h). That would let you move anything that needs
> > to be done once the child devices probe to the aggregate driver 'bind'
> > function (see struct component_master_ops::bind).
>
> Thanks Stephen for letting us know about the component device framework.
>
> IIUC,
>
> - dwc3-qcom (parent of the dwc3 core) registers as a component master by
> calling component_master_add_with_match() before calling
> of_platform_populate(). The match callback could be as simple as comparing
> the device against our child device.
>
> - The dwc3 core (child) at the end of its probe can add as a component by calling
> component_add().
>
> - The above triggers the component_master_ops::bind callback implemented in
> dwc3-qcom driver which signals that we are good to go.
>
> - The dwc-qcom can call component_bind_all() to finish the formality i.e
> telling the dwc3 core that we are good to go.
>
> Is my understanding correct? This is what we are looking for i.e a way for
> the child device(s) to signal the parent when the former is bounded.
Sounds about right to me.
>
> Also what happens when the child device probe fails for any reason. i.e
> component_add() would never be called so the master driver i.e dwc3-qcom would
> wait indefinitely. May be it needs to implement a timeout or runtime suspend
> etc should take care of keeping the resoures in suspend state.
When the child fails probe, it should return -EPROBE_DEFER if probe
needs to be deferred. Then the driver will attempt probe at a later
time. If probe fails without defer then it will never work and dwc3-qcom
will wait indefinitely. Not much we can do in that situation.
dwc3-qcom should wait for dwc3 core to call component_add() and then do
whatever needs to be done once the dwc3 core is registered in the
dwc3-qcom bind callback. Honestly this may all be a little overkill if
there's only two drivers here, dwc3-qcom and dwc3 core. It could
probably just be some callback from dwc3 core at the end of probe that
calls some function in dwc3-qcom.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists