[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9e75687-fadb-2a0f-56c6-37830799774d@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:33:23 +0530
From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<quic_plai@...cinc.com>, <bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
<tiwai@...e.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
<quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<judyhsiao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add software clock gating requirement check
On 6/29/2022 10:30 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 27-06-22, 18:01, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> On 6/23/2022 1:39 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> Thanks for your time Vinod!!!
>>> On 10-06-22, 17:53, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>>> This patch set is to add software clock gating requirement check
>>> This fails to apply for me, please rebase on sdw-next and resend
>>>
>>> Thanks
>> It seems one patch is missing in your branch, which accepted by Mark brown.
> Ok. Pls send on -next and if there are conflicts we can coordinate with
> Mark.
The same patches were sent on -next branch. If the previous applied,
it's being applied directly.
Please correct me If my understanding is wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists