linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:58:20 +0900
From:   Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according
 to shost->max_sectors

On 6/29/22 14:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:33:58PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> Well Christoph originally offered to take this series via the dma-mapping 
>> tree.
>>
>> @Christoph, is that still ok with you? If so, would you rather I send this 
>> libata patch separately?
> 
> The offer still stands, and I don't really care where the libata
> patch is routed.  Just tell me what you prefer.

If it is 100% independent from the other patches, I can take it.
Otherwise, feel free to take it !

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research