linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 11/14] x86: Disable kexec if system has unaccepted memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 03:59:15 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@...e.com>,
        Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
        khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 11/14] x86: Disable kexec if system has unaccepted
 memory

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 05:10:56PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/28/22 16:51, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 05:00:05AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >>> If there is some deep and fundamental why this can not be supported
> >>> then it probably makes sense to put some code in the arch_kexec_load
> >>> hook that verifies that deep and fundamental reason is present.
> ...
> > +	/*
> > +	 * TODO: Information on memory acceptance status has to be communicated
> > +	 * between kernel.
> > +	 */
> 
> So, the deep and fundamental reason is... drum roll... you haven't
> gotten around to implementing bitmap passing yet?!?!?   I have the
> feeling that wasn't what Eric was looking for.

The deep fundamental reason is that everything cannot be implemented and
upstreamed at once.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov