linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220629171341.5b9b5269@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:13:41 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

Hi all,

After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconig)
failed like this:

drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c: In function 'lpi_pinctrl_probe':
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c:391:31: error: assignment of member 'is_clk_optional' in read-only object
  391 |         data->is_clk_optional = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node,
      |                               ^

Caused by commit

  36fe26843d6d ("pinctrl: qcom: sc7280: Add clock optional check for ADSP bypass targets")

I am beginning to wonder if this commit has ever even been compile
tested :-(

I have reverted that commit (and its follow up fix) for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped