[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf9d1cc7-c03d-f5a8-bb96-cfcd352ac36e@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:24:41 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according
to shost->max_sectors
On 6/29/22 16:43, John Garry wrote:
> On 29/06/2022 06:58, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 6/29/22 14:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:33:58PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>>>> Well Christoph originally offered to take this series via the dma-mapping
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> @Christoph, is that still ok with you? If so, would you rather I send this
>>>> libata patch separately?
>>>
>>> The offer still stands, and I don't really care where the libata
>>> patch is routed. Just tell me what you prefer.
>
> Cheers.
>
>>
>> If it is 100% independent from the other patches, I can take it.
>> Otherwise, feel free to take it !
>>
>
> I'll just keep the all together - it's easier in case I need to change
> anything.
Works for me.
>
> Thanks!
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists