[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8sjppts.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:22:07 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@....com>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@....com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC 07/18] drm/display/dp_mst: Add helper for finding
payloads in atomic MST state
On Tue, 07 Jun 2022, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
> We already open-code this quite often, and will be iterating through
> payloads even more once we've moved all of the payload tracking into the
> atomic state. So, let's add a helper for doing this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@....com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@....com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 109 ++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index ec52f91b1f0e..0bc2c7a90c37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -1737,6 +1737,19 @@ drm_dp_mst_dump_port_topology_history(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port) {}
> #define save_port_topology_ref(port, type)
> #endif
>
> +static struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *
> +drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state,
> + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> +{
> + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(payload, &state->payloads, next)
> + if (payload->port == port)
> + return payload;
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb =
> @@ -4381,39 +4394,31 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> int pbn_div)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos, *payload = NULL;
> - int prev_slots, prev_bw, req_slots;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload = NULL;
> + int prev_slots = 0, prev_bw = 0, req_slots;
>
> topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
> return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
>
> /* Find the current allocation for this port, if any */
> - list_for_each_entry(pos, &topology_state->payloads, next) {
> - if (pos->port == port) {
> - payload = pos;
> - prev_slots = payload->time_slots;
> - prev_bw = payload->pbn;
> -
> - /*
> - * This should never happen, unless the driver tries
> - * releasing and allocating the same timeslot allocation,
> - * which is an error
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON(!prev_slots)) {
> - drm_err(mgr->dev,
> - "cannot allocate and release time slots on [MST PORT:%p] in the same state\n",
> - port);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(topology_state, port);
> + if (payload) {
> + prev_slots = payload->time_slots;
> + prev_bw = payload->pbn;
>
> - break;
> + /*
> + * This should never happen, unless the driver tries
> + * releasing and allocating the same timeslot allocation,
> + * which is an error
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON(!prev_slots)) {
> + drm_err(mgr->dev,
> + "cannot allocate and release time slots on [MST PORT:%p] in the same state\n",
> + port);
I guess I'd combine the WARN_ON() and drm_err() to a single
drm_WARN(). Having both is a silly. But can be a follow-up, not part of
this patch really.
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
> - if (!payload) {
> - prev_slots = 0;
> - prev_bw = 0;
> - }
>
> if (pbn_div <= 0)
> pbn_div = mgr->pbn_div;
> @@ -4474,30 +4479,24 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *topology_state;
> - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
> - bool found = false;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
>
> topology_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> if (IS_ERR(topology_state))
> return PTR_ERR(topology_state);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(pos, &topology_state->payloads, next) {
> - if (pos->port == port) {
> - found = true;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - if (WARN_ON(!found)) {
> + payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(topology_state, port);
> + if (WARN_ON(!payload)) {
> drm_err(mgr->dev, "No payload for [MST PORT:%p] found in mst state %p\n",
> port, &topology_state->base);
Ditto.
BR,
Jani.
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> 0\n", port, pos->time_slots);
> - if (pos->time_slots) {
> + drm_dbg_atomic(mgr->dev, "[MST PORT:%p] TU %d -> 0\n", port, payload->time_slots);
> + if (payload->time_slots) {
> drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(port);
> - pos->time_slots = 0;
> - pos->pbn = 0;
> + payload->time_slots = 0;
> + payload->pbn = 0;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -5194,18 +5193,8 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
> return 0;
>
> if (drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) {
> - bool found = false;
> -
> - list_for_each_entry(payload, &state->payloads, next) {
> - if (payload->port != port)
> - continue;
> - if (!payload->pbn)
> - return 0;
> -
> - found = true;
> - break;
> - }
> - if (!found)
> + payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(state, port);
> + if (!payload)
> return 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -5360,34 +5349,26 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> bool enable)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
> - bool found = false;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
> int time_slots = 0;
>
> mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, port->mgr);
> -
> if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
> return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(pos, &mst_state->payloads, next) {
> - if (pos->port == port) {
> - found = true;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (!found) {
> + payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, port);
> + if (!payload) {
> drm_dbg_atomic(state->dev,
> "[MST PORT:%p] Couldn't find payload in mst state %p\n",
> port, mst_state);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (pos->dsc_enabled == enable) {
> + if (payload->dsc_enabled == enable) {
> drm_dbg_atomic(state->dev,
> "[MST PORT:%p] DSC flag is already set to %d, returning %d time slots\n",
> - port, enable, pos->time_slots);
> - time_slots = pos->time_slots;
> + port, enable, payload->time_slots);
> + time_slots = payload->time_slots;
> }
>
> if (enable) {
> @@ -5399,7 +5380,7 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - pos->dsc_enabled = enable;
> + payload->dsc_enabled = enable;
>
> return time_slots;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists